C onclusion early: More pro-Fujimori prevaricator favoritism
1. Early Conclusion: More pro-Fujimori prevaricator favoritism
2. CONCLUSION ANOTHER EARLY ON MONDAY 28 SEPTEMBER NEXT?
by Guillermo Olivera Díaz ; godgod_1@hotmail.com
http://argentina.indymedia.org/news/2009/09/690737.php
07/09/2009 1. In the sentence that condemns ALBERTO FUJIMORI the magic numeral for 07 years and 06 months imprisonment, with cryptic criminal dosimetry, the real contest of willful embezzlement and misappropriation of 15'000, 000.00 U.S. dollars by forging and falsifying documents to steal the treasury so huge sum, competition consummated in a single day: 22 September 2000, ministers and senior military and cheerfully deliver that same day 22 - to Vladimiro Montesinos, as alleged "compensation" for length of service, but without signing any settlement, there is a loud rat prohijado by the rapporteur of the decision: the Chairman of the Board: Dr. CASTRO CESAR SAN MARTIN (Exp. No. AV-23-2001). I imagine the other 02 Supreme Court justices merely signed the paper that it is sentencing.
2. This monster is called "foregone conclusion" the process, under an assumed "honest confession" in an alleged application of article 5 of Law N º 28122. With this biased process, to complete a trial to start, avoiding to be discussed in depth the defendant Fujimori, who in his extradition proceedings CHILE's alleged crime had been denied, denied that the $ 15 million have been delivered to MONTESINOS future electoral purposes or as compensation for length of service (folio 175, Exp on Extradition). It reaffirmed that the sum was an expansion budget for our Armed Forces to avoid the incursion of FARC in Colombia in Peru.
extradited to the country and to their judges, after more than 07 years as a fugitive in Japan and clandestine entry CHILE, so before a judge denied Chilean reiterancia now, PERU, accepts stunningly looking privileges and, most lucky, get them. His acceptance of the incriminating facts presented as "under process" . For the uninitiated might not notice, the legal term escapes "honest confession" that Article 5 of Law 28122 used.
1. Early Conclusion: More pro-Fujimori prevaricator favoritism
2. CONCLUSION ANOTHER EARLY ON MONDAY 28 SEPTEMBER NEXT?
by Guillermo Olivera Díaz ; godgod_1@hotmail.com
http://argentina.indymedia.org/news/2009/09/690737.php
07/09/2009 1. In the sentence that condemns ALBERTO FUJIMORI the magic numeral for 07 years and 06 months imprisonment, with cryptic criminal dosimetry, the real contest of willful embezzlement and misappropriation of 15'000, 000.00 U.S. dollars by forging and falsifying documents to steal the treasury so huge sum, competition consummated in a single day: 22 September 2000, ministers and senior military and cheerfully deliver that same day 22 - to Vladimiro Montesinos, as alleged "compensation" for length of service, but without signing any settlement, there is a loud rat prohijado by the rapporteur of the decision: the Chairman of the Board: Dr. CASTRO CESAR SAN MARTIN (Exp. No. AV-23-2001). I imagine the other 02 Supreme Court justices merely signed the paper that it is sentencing.
2. This monster is called "foregone conclusion" the process, under an assumed "honest confession" in an alleged application of article 5 of Law N º 28122. With this biased process, to complete a trial to start, avoiding to be discussed in depth the defendant Fujimori, who in his extradition proceedings CHILE's alleged crime had been denied, denied that the $ 15 million have been delivered to MONTESINOS future electoral purposes or as compensation for length of service (folio 175, Exp on Extradition). It reaffirmed that the sum was an expansion budget for our Armed Forces to avoid the incursion of FARC in Colombia in Peru.
extradited to the country and to their judges, after more than 07 years as a fugitive in Japan and clandestine entry CHILE, so before a judge denied Chilean reiterancia now, PERU, accepts stunningly looking privileges and, most lucky, get them. His acceptance of the incriminating facts presented as "under process" . For the uninitiated might not notice, the legal term escapes "honest confession" that Article 5 of Law 28122 used.
3. For such an approach in this trial, groups to Peru and the world, accepted by the Board without further ado, you are no longer considered as any defendant, with the clatter media which would harm his daughter Keiko in his desire electoral excess, nor conniving voice was heard ministers co-authors: CARLOS ALBERTO BOLOGNA BEHR, CARLOS ALBERTO CRUZ Bergamin and FEDERICO SALAS LUIS GUEVARA SCHULTZ, among others, that offended him to steal the national treasury that 15 million dollars, charged by the Army General Luis Muente SCHWARTZ and delivered in person to MONTESINOS TORRES in backwater WITHOUT . The vast galaxy of many partners in crime, witnesses and experts may quantifying the economic Forado went unheeded, as the country was not being properly informed a foregone conclusion with illegal covert political purposes by this ruse.
4. This legal proceedings seeking benefits, via a sincere confession, and whose name appears on the Law N º 28122, in paragraphs 25 º, 26 º and 42 º of the disputed sentence is the name under procedural "that matter, "says the text-a way of ending the process from the acceptance by the defendant of the facts of the offense charged and the liability and authorized to terminate the trial in its initial period" .
The Board does not matter that such facts were denied several times in the extradition proceedings in CHILE and they had inconsistencies with the new version provided by gimmicky Fujimori in Lima. This refusal, to a Chilean Supreme Vocal, has categorically at this step and the sentence for the extradition of the Chilean Supreme Court of 21 September 2007, the gloss, though dimly, in its recitals Fifty-ninth, Sixtieth and Sixty-first.
5. In our opinion, the Board headed SAN MARTIN CASTRO transgressed by accepting the process of early termination by sincere confession, under the Act No. 28122. This statute of February 16, 2003, to conclude the process in a rably for certain crimes, the serious and minor injuries, simple and aggravated burglary, aggravated robbery, drug microcomercialización, and when the accused is caught in the act or had made a sincere confession before the judge, under Article 136 of the Code of Criminal Procedure.
In Case FUJIMORI none of these assumptions are given. Neither is being prosecuted for such crimes, but for embezzlement and fraudulent misrepresentation, or been discovered while committing his crime, in flagrante delicto. Neither has made a sincere confession before the judge during instruction, which was rather declared defendant in absentia, for his well-known procedural conduct of international juggler. Furthermore, in paragraph 2 of the Law 28122, is denied the possibility of early termination of the process when the crime under investigation or deemed to have been committed by more than 04 people. We know that FUJIMORI is a battalion of partners in the crime, you are more than 04, subs for the perk.
6. Read what he says pro Judgement FUJIMORI in paragraphs 25 and 26:
"25 º. The accused Fujimori Fujimori, with the express according to his attorney, under Article 5 of Law No. 28122, was subjected to procedural compliance. Said, through his counsel, which postulates a limited compliance ....
therefore complies with the facts asserted by written accusation, but suggested three claims that exclude the use of penalty and civil damages: A) There can be no conviction for embezzlement ... B) is not for condemnation crime of falsifying ... C) is not ordered to pay civil damages. "
"26 º. Accepted pending trial proceeded under, at the request of the defense, the documentary evidence oralization requested by the parties and debate about the content of it. Were read and discussed a total of 27 documents offered by the defense and prosecution. The Attorney Ad Hoc oralization offered no procedural parts. "
In other words, wields FUJIMORI: accept the fact of having stolen, with others, $ 15 million from the national treasury, which were not mine, I agree that the delivered via an EP General MONTESINOS in the presence of Cap.PNP RUIZ MARIO AGUERO ; also agree that to allow the emigration of those juicy 15 million had to make a document called "Emergency Ordinance" , no agreement of the Council of Ministers and that my caring secretary Palace JOSE Kamiya TERU it sealed and numbered as if the DU No. 081-2000 , whose original is not filed in their respective file, but it was left to my comrade BEHR BOLOGNA, who introduced him at the public hearing that went sentences.
However, I accept that that is a crime as they claim to rave the Congress, the Attorney General's Office, the Supreme Vocal Instructor, the High Criminal Court and the Supreme 03 of 05 members who condemned my partners and various Supreme Court justices from CHILE I extradited to Peru.
True to his style and protervia, conclude: the facts if I did, however they are not crimes as you think. Trifles never are, by the principle of "clean slate" . Ergo, do not deserve to be punished for this nonsense they call intentional embezzlement, misrepresentation and civil damages. The sanctions are meant to others. My lawyer conspicuous Nakasaki, of Japanese descent as I know it well and follow my guidelines. This is the sort of FUJIMORI, film, what you think!
7. Will there be another early termination prevaricating on Monday, September 28, 2009, in the trial against Fujimori :
a. by unscrupulous defectors buying congressmen, as Bumachar Kouri, ALISON Pennanen, among many others, that the country would like to see and hear, and that the decision to extradite Chile Peru welcomes the requirement for the crime of bribery of Officials referred to in Article 397 of the Penal Code, and
b. for the unnecessary purchase for the Peruvian State Channel 10 cable television to the tune of two billion U.S. dollars, the elusive EDUARDO DEL SOLAR Calmell , now a fugitive?
8. Don CASTRO CESAR SAN MARTIN and the other 02 Supreme Court justices have the answer, he will deserve severe analysis.
Lima, 06 September 2009. ===========================================
Enlightening letter of well-known lawyer and procedural Olivera Guillermo Diaz, that puts us on alert about the alleged abuse and covenants of the Alan fujimontesinismo order not to damage the race for the seat of his daughter Keiko Pizarro. It is a document that we must address and be aware, is a good warning and I hope I'm wrong in its analysis, the well-known man of law and sentenced for the crimes of state Alberto Fujimori is also convicted of all crimes proven against him
Finally, it is our duty to oppose democratically Keiko and no fujimontesinista come back to power for the sake of our republic, our democracy and Peru.
Lima, Monday, August 7, 2009
0 comments:
Post a Comment